PGMI Students' Conceptual Difficulties with Integers and Their Implications for Mathematics Teaching Readiness
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54723/ejpgmi.v4i2.469Keywords:
conceptual difficulties, integers, pgmi students, teaching readiness, basic mathematics miAbstract
Understanding the concept of integers is a basic competency that prospective Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI) teachers must possess. However, many PGMI students still experience difficulties in mastering this concept in depth, which has the potential to hinder their readiness to teach mathematics at the elementary level. This study used a descriptive qualitative approach involving 15 sixth-semester PGMI students as participants. Data were collected through open- ended diagnostic tests, in-depth interviews, and document analysis of lesson plans. Data analysis techniques employed the Miles and Huberman model, including data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study indicate that students experience difficulties in understanding the meaning of negative numbers, mixed operations with integers, and the use of number line representations. These misconceptions result in inaccuracies in developing learning strategies, low self-confidence when teaching, and an inability to explain concepts coherently to students. These findings highlight the importance of conceptual reinforcement in basic mathematics education at PGMI, as well as the need for a more applied and contextual approach in teaching integer concepts. Recommendations are directed toward the development of conceptual learning modules based on problem-solving and visual representations.
References
Afifah, A. D., & Ahadah, S. Z. (2022). Studi Kasus Kesiapan Diri Sebelum Mengajar Bagi Mahasiswa Pengenalan Lapangan Persekolahan (Plp). 107–113.
Asmarika, Husin, A., Syukri, Wismanto, & Qanita, R. (2022). Mengasah Kemampuan Softskills dan Hardskills Calon Guru SD/MI pada Metode Microteaching Melalui Pengembangan Media Visual Mahasiswa PGMI UMRI. Jurnal Hikmah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(1), 282– 300.https://ojs.staituankutambusai.ac.id/index.php/hikmah/article/view/498/304
Charismana, D. S., Retnawati, H., & Dhewantoro, H. N. S. (2022). Motivasi Belajar Dan Prestasi Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Ppkn Di Indonesia: Kajian Analisis Meta. Bhineka Tunggal Ika: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan PKn, 9(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.36706/jbti.v9i2.18333
Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., Fardani, R. A., Ustiawaty, J., Utami, E. F., Sukmana, D. J., & Istiqomah, R. R. (2020). Buku Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. In Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada (Vol. 5, Issue 1).
Nur, A., Rosyidah, K., Maulyda, M. A., & Oktaviyanti, I. (2020). Miskonsepsi mhsw pgsd dlm peng op hitung camp. 2(01), 16.
Rahmadani, N., Wardhani, S., & Sumah, A. S. W. (2022). Hubungan kemampuan awal, pemahaman konsep, dan hasil belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran daring di SMAN Sumatera Selatan. Bioma : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.26877/bioma.v11i1.8425
Rustam, F. R., Danial, D., Syarifuddin, S., & Fitriani, F. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika ke-MI/SD-an Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. JTMT: Journal Tadris Matematika, 3(2), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.47435/jtmt.v3i2.1363
Saputra, A. W. (2023). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa PGMI pada Mata Kuliah Matematika Materi Geometri Ruang dan Alternatif Solusinya. PELITA Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 1(2), 53–60.
Slamet Suyanto. (2005). Metode Penelitian Sosial (Issue September).
Wawan, Talib, A., & Djam’an, N. (2017). Analisis Pemahaman Konseptual dan Prosedural Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar. Issues in Mathematics Education, 1(2), 101–106. http://www.ojs.unm.ac.id/imed
Wulandari, S. (2021). Optimalisasi Penguasaan Materi Pelajaran dan Kemampuan Mengelola Kelas dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Mengajar Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam. Chalim Journal of Teaching and Learning (CJoTL), 1(2), 129-137.le. Chalim Journal of Teaching and Learning (CJoTL), 1(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.31538











